Think Tanks in the United States Essay Example for Free

Research organizations in the United States Essay A research organization (otherwise called an approach place) is a non-benefit research foundation that behaviors concentrates on open strategy (Columbia University Libraries, n. pag.). Beside open approach investigation, a research organization likewise takes part in creating answers for national or business issues (Rohrer, n. pag.). Despite the fact that there are some research organizations that are carefully impartial (their examination on open arrangement issues are not influenced by political results), think tanks are by and large viewed as associations that offer scholarly help to ideological groups as well as lawmakers. Henceforth, a research organization is considered as a significant piece of the American political scene (Columbia University Libraries, n. pag.). Nonetheless, think tanks influence American international strategy and financial improvement abroad by concocting ethnocentric and xenophobic points of view. Sometimes, American research organizations make unreasonable, savage and even destructive strategies, larger part of which the US government forces on Third World nations. More terrible, the non military personnel nature of these associations permits them to get away from responsibility for their unfavorable thoughts (Hayes, 3).  â â â â â â â â â â In the article A Litany of Horrors: America’s University of Imperialism (2008), Chalmers Johnson composed that the RAND Corporation, one of the most seasoned existing research organizations in the US, was â€Å"the head think tank for the US’ job as hegemon of the Western world (Johnson, n. pag.). To help his contention, Johnson nitty gritty the historical backdrop of RAND’s dynamic cooperation in US military intercession since it was established after World War II. During the Cold War, RAND propagated the â€Å"arms race† between the US and the Soviet Union by asking the last to make immense requests for weapons, for example, nuclear bombs, atomic submarines, intercontinental ballistic rockets and long-run aircraft. During the 1960s and the 1970s, RAND’s hostile to Marxist way of talking intensely impacted the US to engage in the Vietnam War and to build up manikin governments in Third World nations that incorporated the Philippines, Thailand, Chile and Taiwan (Johnson, n. pag.).  â â â â â â â â â â RAND was likewise intensely engaged with the Iraq War in 2002. During 9/11, previous Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci was the co-seat of the RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy Advisory Board and was likewise an individual from the RAND Board of Trustees. Be that as it may, he was moreover the director of the Carlyle Group, a safeguard temporary worker with solid associations with the Saudi Royal Family and the Bin Laden tribe. Other key players in the Iraq War that held significant situations in the RAND Corporation were Paul Wolfowitz, Condoleeza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld (Here in Reality, n. pag.).  â â â â â â â â â â Aside from the RAND Corporation, other American research organizations that were likewise busy with the advancement of American international strategy and monetary improvement abroad were the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP) and the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Much the same as RAND, the organization of the NIPP and the PNAC are both made out of unilateralist ideologues, the majority of which are previous administrators, specialists or significant investors of the country’s greatest protection contractual workers. A portion of the people who were associated with these research organizations proceeded to become government authorities. Subsequently, it should no longer come as an astonishment in the event that US military mediation has expanded in the earlier decades (Ciarrocca Hartung, n. pag.).  â â â â â â â â â â The NIPP has solid binds with the atomic weapons industry. The vast majority of the individuals from its warning board were some time ago associated with the arms and atomic divisions of significant barrier temporary workers. Kathleen Bailey, for example, filled in as an expert for the Lawrence Livermore atomic weapons research center for a long time. Robert Barker, in the interim, worked for the weapons lab of Lawrence Livermore for a long time. Charles Kupperman was Lockheed Martin’s VP for its national rocket guard programs (Ciarrocca Hartung, n. pag.).  â â â â â â â â â â The administration of the PNAC is comprised of William Kristol (editorial manager of the Weekly Standard), Robert Kagan (senior partner at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, contributing supervisor at the Weekly Standard and feature writer for the Washington Post) and Bruce Jackson (a long-lasting Lockheed Martin official). Established in 1997, PNAC’s standards depended on â€Å"the Reagan administration’s achievement (in consummation the Cold War)† and required the restoration of â€Å"a military that is solid and prepared to meet both present and future challenges† (Ciarrocca Hartung, n. pag.). It must be noticed that the establishing archive of PNAC was marked by significant players in the Bush national security group, for example, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld. Moreover, PNAC’s representative executive Thomas Donnelly was employed by Lockheed Martin in 2003 (Ciarrocca Hartung, n. p ag.).  â â â â â â â â â â Given the foundation of RAND, PNAC and NIPP, it is extremely evident that there is a contention between the destinations of research organizations and American international strategy (which concentrated for the most part on advancing American qualities abroad). The vast majority of the research organizations that are subsidiary with the US government are additionally associated with organizations that advantage monetarily from war. It is in this manner simply a question of regular rationale to expect that research organizations like RAND, PNAC and NIPP will exhort the US government to take up arms against different nations (regardless of how wobbly the support is) essentially in light of the fact that the resistance contractual workers that they are associated with will acquire hugely from doing as such.  â â â â â â â â â â Furthermore, there are some US legislators who are moreover subsidiary with associations that benefit from war. Previous President George Bush, Sr., for example, is a previous Senior Advisor in the Carlyle Group. Previous Secretary of State and Secretary of Treasury James Baker, then, was previous Carlyle Senior Counselor. Carlyle Managing Director Richard Darman additionally happens to be the White House Budget Advisor (Here in Reality, n. pag.). It is clear that their association to Carlyle makes them see war as a road for benefit, and not as a monstrosity that claims endless guiltless lives.  â â â â â â â â â â While think tanks are magnificent wellsprings of data and thoughts, irreconcilable situation emerges when these organizations influence government strategy. Research organizations working together and bringing in cash while prompting the US government simultaneously ought to be considered as a grave reason for concern. In reality, what will figure tanks do when personal business conflict with open strategy? What will be their stand when exactly the same government official that they bolstered is condemned for applying the thoughts that they have defined? Works Cited Ciarrocca, Michelle and Hartung, William. â€Å"The Military-Industrial-Think Tank Complex:  â â â â â â â â â â Corporate Think Tanks and the Doctrine of Aggressive Militarism.† January-February The Business of War. 9 June 2008 http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/mm2003/03jan-feb/jan-feb03corp2.html. Hayes, Peter. â€Å"The Role of Think Tanks in Defining Security Issues and Agendas.† Nautilus Foundation. 21 October 2004. 8 June 2008 www.nautilus.org/collective/article/2004/1021_Hayes.pdf. Johnson, Chalmers. â€Å"A Litany of Horrors: America’s University of Imperialism.† 29 April TomDispatch.com. 8 June 2008 http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174925/chalmers_johnson_teaching_imperialism_101. â€Å"Meet the Carlyle Group.† n.d. Here in Reality. 09 June 2008 http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html. Rohrer, Finlo. â€Å"Just What Is A Think Tank?† 15 January 2008. BBC News. 08 June 2008  â â â â â â â â â â http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hello there/magazine/7189094.stm. â€Å"The People We Pay to Think.† n.d. Here in Reality. 09 June 2008  â â â â â â â â â â http://www.hereinreality.com/news/rand.html. â€Å"Think Tanks Policy Centers.† n.d. Columbia University Libraries †Lehman Social Sciences Library. 08 June 2008 http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/lehman/guides/ttanks.html.